<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shared: AWP Express</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2009/12/awp-express/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2009%2F12%2Fawp-express&amp;seed_title=Shared%3A+AWP+Express</link>
	<description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brade</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2009%2F12%2Fawp-express&amp;seed_title=Shared%3A+AWP+Express/comment-page-1#comment-42247</link>
		<dc:creator>Brade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tumblelog.mikeindustries.com/post/304728955#comment-42247</guid>
		<description>Certainly not bad, but it&#039;s got a few problems IMO. I know &quot;above the fold&quot; is totally overrated in web design, but in this case there seems to be an extreme amount of screen space devoted only to the title and logo at the top. I&#039;m rocking a typical 1440x900 MBP and the actual content starts 2/3 down the page. I&#039;d hate to be a 1024x768 user.

Speaking of which: prepare to have your mind slightly ruptured when resizing your browser window.

I&#039;m also not a fan of the blurred paper airplane at the bottom left, which clings to the frame border unnecessarily. A pretty typical graphic design &quot;don&#039;t&quot; right there.

Nothing against the agency, which might be rad-sauce (though I&#039;m always wary of &quot;custom CMS&quot; offerings). But I&#039;ve seen better.

I always pimp www.hugeinc.com as my favorite example of a web design agency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly not bad, but it&#8217;s got a few problems IMO. I know &#8220;above the fold&#8221; is totally overrated in web design, but in this case there seems to be an extreme amount of screen space devoted only to the title and logo at the top. I&#8217;m rocking a typical 1440&#215;900 MBP and the actual content starts 2/3 down the page. I&#8217;d hate to be a 1024&#215;768 user.</p>
<p>Speaking of which: prepare to have your mind slightly ruptured when resizing your browser window.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not a fan of the blurred paper airplane at the bottom left, which clings to the frame border unnecessarily. A pretty typical graphic design &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; right there.</p>
<p>Nothing against the agency, which might be rad-sauce (though I&#8217;m always wary of &#8220;custom CMS&#8221; offerings). But I&#8217;ve seen better.</p>
<p>I always pimp <a href="http://www.hugeinc.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hugeinc.com</a> as my favorite example of a web design agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan klyn</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2009%2F12%2Fawp-express&amp;seed_title=Shared%3A+AWP+Express/comment-page-1#comment-42246</link>
		<dc:creator>dan klyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tumblelog.mikeindustries.com/post/304728955#comment-42246</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my nominee for non-sucky, CSS-beautiful design agency site:

http://www.daggerfin.com/

As to why so few agencies have finely wrought (let alone conceived) websites... that&#039;s a mystery above my pay grade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my nominee for non-sucky, CSS-beautiful design agency site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.daggerfin.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.daggerfin.com/</a></p>
<p>As to why so few agencies have finely wrought (let alone conceived) websites&#8230; that&#8217;s a mystery above my pay grade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
