Paparazzi 2.0: Coolspotters Launches

A few days ago, my ex-colleagues from ESPN.com launched a new site: Coolspotters.

It’s a soon-to-be gigantic database of public figures and the products they use. Want to see what watch Barack Obama wears? How about what jeans Steve Jobs wears? Or anything at all about Gisele Bundchen

It’s all right there for your perusing pleasure, but even better, it’s 100% powered by the community (of course) so you can add photos and details if you happen to snap that candid shot of Anna Kournikova pulling up in her Escalade.

The site is interesting to me on many levels:

  • Although I’m not generally interested in what public figures buy (although millions of people are), I’m very interested in the concept of how to express your consumer tastes on the web. I’m equal parts salesman, connector, and maven in the Gladwellian sense and product “endorsements” on the web have the ability to touch all three disciplines. Whoever successfully discovers how to get everyone to express their product endorsements on the web without seeming salesy is going to be a huge financial success.
  • Coolspotters was created by a very talented group of friends who I’ve worked with for years and funded by the same people who funded us at Newsvine. In that sense, they are a sister company to us.
  • The site has really fantastic click appeal. In other words, without registering or otherwise even “getting” the site, you can click around for hours (see previous words re: Bundchen and Kournikova). This is something I always wanted to do better at Newsvine; showcasing content that is a lot lighter on the brain and the attention span.
  • The design, courtesy of Aaron Weyenberg and Mark Boulton, is of course fantastic.

So anyway, check out Coolspotters.com and let the fellas know what you think in the comments below.

Like this entry? You probably shouldn't follow me on Twitter here. I recommend the RSS feed instead.

18 Responses:

  1. Sweet. Now I can pick me up a pair of those Air Steve’s I’ve been lusting over.

  2. Mike says:

    Looks fantastic! It’s rare to see a website with a nice design that is usable to boot. Definitely one for the bookmarks.

  3. Sandy says:

    What is this all about … Icon? I thought you had to have a G5, or at least an SL65 to be listed in this category: http://coolspotters.com/business-icons/mike-davidson

    Sure will be cool to see how this site grows. Judging from my wife’s appetite for this kind of thing, I can see the affiliate dough being truly astronomical.

  4. Mike D. says:

    Sandy: Uhhhmm yeeeeeah, that must be an artifact from the beta testing. Good times.

  5. Mike G. says:

    The color schema is very flickr-esque. Not that there is anyting wrong with that.

  6. Byron McCollum says:

    Damnit!

    I though this was going to be about an update to Paparazzi, the Mac webpage screenshot utility.

  7. Adam says:

    Fantastic! Now I won’t have to hear about that pesky Iraq war, or keep up with the elections anymore!

  8. Jason says:

    Novel idea I suppose, albiet a little superficial. But my instant critiques are 1) why are so many of the photos so small and 2) why does the icon usually cover the actual item in question, which leads to 3) the combination of the two leave me wondering how anyone can tell what kind of phone, watch, or sunglasses are in the photo? (is it just me or?)

  9. At first blush, I see a clash of demographics. Web 2.0 targeting the fashion elite? It feels like a so-so idea implemented really well. But, I wonder if people won’t tire of the (as Jason puts it) superficial aspect of the concept pretty quickly.

    I get the impression that designers can be a pretty cynical bunch, and I simply don’t see going to a website to take a look at (say) Justin Timberlake to make a purchasing decision based on which $500 pair of jeans he’s wearing on any given day. The cynicism in me wants to rebel against the idea that I should be checking in on famous people I don’t respect, who probably annoy me, and what they’re wearing at any given moment.

    In short, it’s like they took the magazine rack in a supermarket checkout lane, added on a bit of social-networking web 2.0 sheen, and are trying to convince people that they should care about these things, probably in an effort to earn a bit of revenue sharing income.

    “Peer Pressure 2.0″

    I think I’d like it better without the celebrity angle. I have no aspirations of keeping up with those joneses, but knowing that 20 of my peers (people I actually respect on one level or another) just rushed out to buy the flip might move me to do the same thing.

  10. The entrepreneur in me wishes he’d thought of it.

    But the rest of me, thinks oh great, yet another thing adding to the “high school-ification” of america.

    I am sure the least common denominator crowd/followers will eat it up.

  11. Brade says:

    What’s the difference between a fan and a follower?

    This site seems like info overload, with vague links aplenty all over the place. I agree with Brian Ford: “It feels like a so-so idea implemented really well.”

    I don’t see myself coming back unless a page appears on digg… ER I MEAN NEWSVINE.

  12. [...] along with this is Coolspotters, basically a database of celebrities and the products they use. Mike Davidson of Newsvine fame gives a good [...]

  13. Raymonty says:

    Mike ~ I have been telling Calvin Tang to start his own clothing design company. Do you think that this is a good idea? Coolspotters is a good place to get started – Ray/Raymonty.

  14. phillip says:

    Looks like a good looking site useful for those that just want the same watch or shoe as someone they admire :)

    Can someone explain what their business model is?

    I looked at their site and have also looked at the Newsvine site and don’t see any banners or ads. I assume most sites make money via subscritions (ie Flickr) or otherwise sell banner space (ie new sites, google).

  15. Mike D. says:

    phillip: There are ads all over both sites.

  16. phillip says:

    So you make most of your income off ads?

    I think I must have installed one of those ‘hosts’ files so I don’t see ads on some sites.

  17. phillip says:

    Set firefox to use a proxy server. Wow, I see all the ads now ; )

  18. Michaela says:

    Wow. I find this kinda scary actually. The technology can be translated to Facebook, for example, where you can then tag all the ubercool products you flaunt in your personal pictures (and, as Brian Ford implied, you know people will do that, just to show their friends they wear obscure Euro-jeans or Kate Moss mascara). This info can then be used by Facebook or whomever to personalize/customize their advertising messages and banners. Information like that would be incredibly valuable to big brands trying to gain a new segment, especially considering Facebook has info about your nationality, location, age, education level, etc etc.

Leave a Reply

Shared

Hundreds of headlines wash over us every day. And part of why many of us engage in this flow is because we have faith that over time, this torrent of episodic knowledge is going to cohere into something more significant: a framework for genuinely understanding an issue. And we live with it ’cause it sort of works. Eventually you hear enough buzzwords like “single-payer” and “public option” and you start to feel like you can play along.

But mounting evidence indicates that this approach to information is actually totally debilitating. Faced with a flood of headlines on an ever-increasing variety of topics, we shut off. We turn to news that doesn’t require much understanding – crime, traffic, weather – or we turn off the news altogether.

- Matt Thompson on why the way we report and consume news is precisely wrong. Matt is, of course, precisely right. If you’re at SXSW next week, I don’t know how you could justify missing this talk.

Cameron’s Colosseo letterpress poster is now available: The only question is, black or white? The black is oh so tempting!

Jon Stewart Skewers Media’s Obsession with Chat Roulette: Funniest Wii Craps reference ever, as well. It’s really interesting to me that Chat Roulette is getting this much “attention” when TinyChat has been around so much longer, essentially does the same thing and more, and is much more useful to the average person. Just goes to show how viral public sex acts can be.

"Add features and customers forever and rake in the dough.":

The 2005 email that spawned Picnik, Google’s latest buy. If you’re thinking about launching a startup, you should study this e-mail carefully. It’s a perfect example of exactly how a crazy little thought becomes a big idea, and even on its own, it’s better than most “official company business plans” people present to VCs.  I gave a talk at Webstock in New Zealand a couple of weeks ago about creating a startup and I wish I had this to dissect at the time. Really good stuff.

Tumblr Finally Rolls Out Comments. Sort Of. Trolls Not Welcome. :

I actually really like how clubby it is.  Unfortunately it means I won’t be commenting on any Tumblrs since I don’t officially “follow” anyone besides via RSS, but that’s probably ok. Maybe the answer to the world’s wide-open commenting problem is something like this.

Episode 2 of Dan Benjamin's "The Conversation" is Live:

I was a guest on Dan Benjamin’s new weekly radio show last week, along with Merlin Mann, Christina Warren, Adam Keys, and Dave Nanian. Subjects discussed include Newsvine, keeping your own identity after becoming part of a big company, and the RADICAL concept of only publishing stuff to your readers and followers that is actually true.

LESS - Leaner CSS:

Given that pre-compiling CSS is an official “best practice” these days, why not use that compile step to extend CSS in powerful ways? LESS lets you use variables, nested rules, and other niceties at author-time to clean up your rules and keep everything tidy. I believe The Wolf made something like this a few years ago, but I haven’t heard about it since.

How 3D works, and why it's back:

Great article on the ins and outs of three dimensional imagery. Still doesn’t change my opinion that well-shot conventional cinematography is more impressive than the novelty that is Avatar.

The Importance of Removing Features:

This is one of the most useful articles I’ve read in a long time. As we work on focusing, strengthening, and simplifying Newsvine, the concepts discussed by Lukas ring true. “Saying no” has never been a strong suit of mine. It’s very helpful to remember how important of a quality it is. (via fullstopinteractive)

Newly released video of the space shuttle Challenger disaster: It was 24 years ago, I was in 5th grade, but I remember it like it was yesterday. School was stopped immediately and they wheeled out televisions in every classroom for us to watch the news footage. It’s great that this video has been released, but holy crap, how do you tuck something that away for two decades???

A nicely done british parody of 60 Minutes style video journalism. It’s easy to miss how formulaic our news is sometimes. (via B-Tizzle, originally via E-Chizzle)

Colosseo: This is why Cameron is a king and we are all just pawns in his world. I can’t wait to get my hands on this poster. I will point out, however, that the outro credits on the video need some kerning. Someone is going to lose their right hand for that.

Spezify:

New ways of searching are almost never as useful as old ways of searching. Spezify is pretty awesome though. It’s a visually interesting, never-ending, horizontally and vertically scrollable, topic explorer. I don’t think I’d use it for digging deep on anything, but to get a quick visually rich sampling of a topic, it’s quite fun (via tiff, a long time ago actually, over email).

Realism in UI Design:

Reminds me of my favorite logo design advice: “Never waste a stroke”. (via gruber)

Overshared
This Kindle ad is cute and Applelike but misses the mark. Advertise what you do well: price and battery life http://bit.ly/cFBw70
@codinghorror Aliased Monaco 9 should be in the Smithsonian.
Why does the media continue to cover what Rob Glaser thinks about the future?
@Trenti Ummm, the Timex Sinclair came out after the VIC-20, beeeeeeeayatch! I will out-old you any day!
@paulsmith Wow. I love the user manual shooting out from Shatner's shoulder at the perfect angle. http://j.mp/am10eU
@paulsmith You have me beat by mere months there! I cut my teeth on a Practical Peripherals 1200 bauder.
@roblifford Probably a 10% chance I fly in at the last minute for a couple of nights. Other than that, planning to skip this year.
I can't believe @shauninman's first computer was a G4. I feel ancient. Mine was a VIC-20. http://5by5.tv/pipeline/5
Wow, how did I not know about Lala until now? Tons of great full albums, free: http://bit.ly/dBrdLw
Thanks for everyone who suggested Brizzly. Going to fire that sucker up again...
Is there a way to unfollow people but still allow them to DM you? Like a "mute" setting or something?
@levifig Burn-in was a bigger issue with first-gen plasmas. They are much better now. LCDs have their own lighting issues as well.
@horsedreamer The black isn't quite as good as some other top plasmas, but it's better than all LCDs. At an inch thick, I'll take it.
@levifig Isn't ghosting mainly an issue for LCDs? I've had a plasma for four years and no ghosting whatsoever.
@jcroft LCD or plasma, most people keep their sets way too bright. Kind of like the settings you see at BestBuy.