<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2007/03/communication/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication</link>
	<description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:51:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14686</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14686</guid>
		<description>Should we dare ask what you miscommunicated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we dare ask what you miscommunicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14687</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14687</guid>
		<description>Fair question but one I can&#039;t answer explicitly. Because I failed to be clear about a particular matter and subsequently failed to follow up on it with further communication, others believed something I didn&#039;t intend to convey... and that&#039;s unfortunately my fault and something I&#039;m going to spend the weekend beating myself up about.  And then when the weekend&#039;s over, I&#039;ll work on getting better about it.  Sorry for the obscurity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair question but one I can&#8217;t answer explicitly. Because I failed to be clear about a particular matter and subsequently failed to follow up on it with further communication, others believed something I didn&#8217;t intend to convey&#8230; and that&#8217;s unfortunately my fault and something I&#8217;m going to spend the weekend beating myself up about.  And then when the weekend&#8217;s over, I&#8217;ll work on getting better about it.  Sorry for the obscurity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14688</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14688</guid>
		<description>Now why does this sound familiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now why does this sound familiar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14689</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14689</guid>
		<description>judging by this post you need to get out a bit more!!

;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>judging by this post you need to get out a bit more!!</p>
<p>;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14690</guid>
		<description>Eric: Yeah, totally different subjects, but same exact principle of communication as responsibility of the sender.

Emma: Unfortunately I think it means I need to get out a bit &lt;em&gt;less&lt;/em&gt; and that I need to start overcommunicating in a much more official way. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric: Yeah, totally different subjects, but same exact principle of communication as responsibility of the sender.</p>
<p>Emma: Unfortunately I think it means I need to get out a bit <em>less</em> and that I need to start overcommunicating in a much more official way. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14691</guid>
		<description>I assume you meant to type &quot;at all interested&quot; instead of &quot;all at.&quot;   

Or was that a trap to see if we&#039;d catch something?  Like those &quot;and and&quot; duplications our eyes don&#039;t catch because they occur at the end of one line and the beginning of another?

But yeah, I&#039;d say that we&#039;re all in the same boat:  we could all learn to 
to communicate more clearly.

;-)

&lt;em&gt;(Editor&#039;s Note: Good catch.  Fixed!)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you meant to type &#8220;at all interested&#8221; instead of &#8220;all at.&#8221;   </p>
<p>Or was that a trap to see if we&#8217;d catch something?  Like those &#8220;and and&#8221; duplications our eyes don&#8217;t catch because they occur at the end of one line and the beginning of another?</p>
<p>But yeah, I&#8217;d say that we&#8217;re all in the same boat:  we could all learn to<br />
to communicate more clearly.</p>
<p>;-)</p>
<p><em>(Editor&#8217;s Note: Good catch.  Fixed!)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14692</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14692</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree, it takes two to communicate.  The communicatee should engage in active listening (essentially repeat back what was said to clarify they understood accurately)  and then the communicator can understand that the other person took it different than presented.

I think the obsessive side of your personality may be too close to the surface this week.  Call a friend and go relax.  You always want to do better tomorrow, but no sense beating yourself up :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree, it takes two to communicate.  The communicatee should engage in active listening (essentially repeat back what was said to clarify they understood accurately)  and then the communicator can understand that the other person took it different than presented.</p>
<p>I think the obsessive side of your personality may be too close to the surface this week.  Call a friend and go relax.  You always want to do better tomorrow, but no sense beating yourself up :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Edge</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14693</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Edge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14693</guid>
		<description>From TMZ.com:

Mike Davidson, after a recent misunderstanding during conversation, has announced he is now married.
Let this be a lesson to all readers: miscommunication with a stranger can end in matrimony.

-- false</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From TMZ.com:</p>
<p>Mike Davidson, after a recent misunderstanding during conversation, has announced he is now married.<br />
Let this be a lesson to all readers: miscommunication with a stranger can end in matrimony.</p>
<p>&#8211; false</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14694</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14694</guid>
		<description>I agree with Don that it is a two-way street.  Many times, the communication process breaks down because a person hears what they want to hear rather than what was said.

Next time you&#039;re arguing with someone, stop and ask them to repeat back what you just said.  It is amazing how often they can&#039;t or it is totally different.

People tend to fight the battle they want, rather than the one at hand.  Sadly, this is common in relationships and marriage.

Basically, the fault can fall on either side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Don that it is a two-way street.  Many times, the communication process breaks down because a person hears what they want to hear rather than what was said.</p>
<p>Next time you&#8217;re arguing with someone, stop and ask them to repeat back what you just said.  It is amazing how often they can&#8217;t or it is totally different.</p>
<p>People tend to fight the battle they want, rather than the one at hand.  Sadly, this is common in relationships and marriage.</p>
<p>Basically, the fault can fall on either side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14695</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14695</guid>
		<description>Never drink and blog! (just kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never drink and blog! (just kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leodora</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14696</link>
		<dc:creator>leodora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14696</guid>
		<description>Obviously you&#039;re not familiar with such phenomena as selective hearing, denial, or simply the refusal to listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously you&#8217;re not familiar with such phenomena as selective hearing, denial, or simply the refusal to listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14697</guid>
		<description>Don, Matt, and leodora: You are all correct, but even given those impediments, the simple repeating of the statement shortly thereafter and the mentioning of it an a documented form (like email) can do a lot to reduce ambiguity and misunderstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, Matt, and leodora: You are all correct, but even given those impediments, the simple repeating of the statement shortly thereafter and the mentioning of it an a documented form (like email) can do a lot to reduce ambiguity and misunderstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14698</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14698</guid>
		<description>Have a look at my latest posting....could this be Apple&#039;s most exciting announcement to come? If not this year, maybe next? Hope this cheers you up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have a look at my latest posting&#8230;.could this be Apple&#8217;s most exciting announcement to come? If not this year, maybe next? Hope this cheers you up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14699</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14699</guid>
		<description>Yep, Don, Matt and leodora are all spot on.

I&#039;m finding that I&#039;m now putting as much as possible in writing these days, although it chews up some valuable time, it has already saved me from several potential issues that would have chewed up even more time.

If it&#039;s in writing it&#039;s hard to refute... If it&#039;s verbal it&#039;s way too easy for the communicatee to turn their perspective into fact.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Don, Matt and leodora are all spot on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finding that I&#8217;m now putting as much as possible in writing these days, although it chews up some valuable time, it has already saved me from several potential issues that would have chewed up even more time.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s in writing it&#8217;s hard to refute&#8230; If it&#8217;s verbal it&#8217;s way too easy for the communicatee to turn their perspective into fact.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2007%2F03%2Fcommunication&amp;seed_title=Communication/comment-page-1#comment-14700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14700</guid>
		<description>Perhaps another course in Speech Communication is in order?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps another course in Speech Communication is in order?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
