<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Redesign or Stealthy Affiliate Program?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/08/google-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F</link>
	<description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7876</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7876</guid>
		<description>Hey, there&#039;s no image in this article, what gives? First time I&#039;ve seen that here at Mike Industries ;-)

Judging by the &#039;Powered by&#039; image on that page you show, it would seem like option #1 is not correct, why would Google say they are powered by themselves, seems kinda demeaning of themselves. They may as well just say that they are the all powerful search engine.

I don&#039;t like the idea of #2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, there&#8217;s no image in this article, what gives? First time I&#8217;ve seen that here at Mike Industries ;-)</p>
<p>Judging by the &#8216;Powered by&#8217; image on that page you show, it would seem like option #1 is not correct, why would Google say they are powered by themselves, seems kinda demeaning of themselves. They may as well just say that they are the all powerful search engine.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the idea of #2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7877</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7877</guid>
		<description>Have you tried clicking the &quot;What is this page?&quot; link in the top right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried clicking the &#8220;What is this page?&#8221; link in the top right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parkes</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7878</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7878</guid>
		<description>Well, it looks to me like an &#039;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/adsense/ws-overview&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AdSense for Search&lt;/a&gt;&#039; page - in which case, I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;re looking at #2.

I&#039;m not sure, but wouldn&#039;t you get the same ping result anyway - the AdSense and &#039;normal&#039; versions of Google could well be on the same server, couldn&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks to me like an &#8216;<a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/ws-overview" rel="nofollow">AdSense for Search</a>&#8216; page &#8211; in which case, I&#8217;m pretty sure you&#8217;re looking at #2.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure, but wouldn&#8217;t you get the same ping result anyway &#8211; the AdSense and &#8216;normal&#8217; versions of Google could well be on the same server, couldn&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7879</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7879</guid>
		<description>I agree that #2 seems much more likely, and that yes, it&#039;s potentially not good. But if it&#039;s cool with Google, it seems like it certainly could generate some revenue for ISPs.

Anon: Yeah, I clicked the link and it explains something about AdSense, which seems very &quot;affiliate-like&quot;, but it also seems non-kosher because the page definitely does not explain that the ISP in this sort of agreement. Something about it just seems jimmy-rigged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that #2 seems much more likely, and that yes, it&#8217;s potentially not good. But if it&#8217;s cool with Google, it seems like it certainly could generate some revenue for ISPs.</p>
<p>Anon: Yeah, I clicked the link and it explains something about AdSense, which seems very &#8220;affiliate-like&#8221;, but it also seems non-kosher because the page definitely does not explain that the ISP in this sort of agreement. Something about it just seems jimmy-rigged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Parkes</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7880</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Parkes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7880</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AdSense T&amp;C&lt;/a&gt; have to say:

&lt;em&gt;... all search queries (including queries entered into an Ad search box) must originate from individual human end users inputting data directly into a Search Box (or Ad search box, as applicable) on Your Site(s).&lt;/em&gt;

They don&#039;t say anything about sneaky proxy redirects, but it looks to me like they&#039;re in breach of Google&#039;s rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what the <a href="https://www.google.com/adsense/localized-terms" rel="nofollow">AdSense T&#038;C</a> have to say:</p>
<p><em>&#8230; all search queries (including queries entered into an Ad search box) must originate from individual human end users inputting data directly into a Search Box (or Ad search box, as applicable) on Your Site(s).</em></p>
<p>They don&#8217;t say anything about sneaky proxy redirects, but it looks to me like they&#8217;re in breach of Google&#8217;s rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Schwarz</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Schwarz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an affiliate program...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/custom?domains=schwarztech.us&amp;q=ipod&amp;sitesearch=&amp;sitesearch=schwarztech.us&amp;client=pub-4235796461002755&amp;forid=1&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;oe=ISO-8859-1&amp;cof=GALT%3A%23888888%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23003399%3BVLC%3ACC0000%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A003399%3BALC%3A003399%3BLC%3A003399%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A003399%3BGIMP%3A003399%3BLH%3A44%3BLW%3A270%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwarztech.us%2Fimages%2Fsearch.gif%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwarztech.us%3BFORID%3A1%3B&amp;hl=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;we have it too&lt;/a&gt;, and make money off of the AdSense for Search (not much).

I&#039;m not sure why no image loaded nor why you got that to begin with...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an affiliate program&#8230;<a href="http://www.google.com/custom?domains=schwarztech.us&#038;q=ipod&#038;sitesearch=&#038;sitesearch=schwarztech.us&#038;client=pub-4235796461002755&#038;forid=1&#038;ie=ISO-8859-1&#038;oe=ISO-8859-1&#038;cof=GALT%3A%23888888%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23003399%3BVLC%3ACC0000%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3A003399%3BALC%3A003399%3BLC%3A003399%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A003399%3BGIMP%3A003399%3BLH%3A44%3BLW%3A270%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwarztech.us%2Fimages%2Fsearch.gif%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.schwarztech.us%3BFORID%3A1%3B&#038;hl=en" rel="nofollow">we have it too</a>, and make money off of the AdSense for Search (not much).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why no image loaded nor why you got that to begin with&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7882</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7882</guid>
		<description>Eric: Good info.  Interesting.  So what are the ways in which someone can access your page?  I mean, the only really weird part about the whole thing for me is that it comes up directly when I search through the front page of google.com and even in the built-in Safari search box.  That is the part that seems stealthy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric: Good info.  Interesting.  So what are the ways in which someone can access your page?  I mean, the only really weird part about the whole thing for me is that it comes up directly when I search through the front page of google.com and even in the built-in Safari search box.  That is the part that seems stealthy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>Definitely #2. Really weird though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely #2. Really weird though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7884</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7884</guid>
		<description>Certainly seems like something shadey going on there.  

What is odd is that the IP, you said, comes back as Googles IP.  Does a traceroute shed any light perhaps?

Hey, I just gave hacking Googles search page a shot and found it is VERY VERY easy to remove the top graphic and change the search page to leave off the &quot;Search Domain.com&quot;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/custom?q=ipod&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=ISO-8859-1&amp;client=pub-4235796461002755&amp;cof=FORID:1%3BLH:44%3BLW:270%3BGL:1%3BBGC:FFFFFF%3BT:%23000000%3BLC:%23003399%3BVLC:%23cc0000%3BALC:%23003399%3BGALT:%23888888%3BGFNT:%23003399%3BGIMP:%23003399%3BDIV:%23003399%3BLBGC:003399%3BAH:center%3B&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;schwarztech.us  hacked Google search&lt;/a&gt;  Clicking this link will bring you to a page or search results.  I bet even with the banner removed the Ad&#039;s still generate a penny or 2 for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/08/google-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program#6322&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;.  So the only thing I don&#039;t know is what they did to redirect people to their Google search results.  

Being so close to Mountain View, I would think a Google employee or 2 might have made it up there.  They should be fired if they either don&#039;t notice or can&#039;t figure out what to do about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly seems like something shadey going on there.  </p>
<p>What is odd is that the IP, you said, comes back as Googles IP.  Does a traceroute shed any light perhaps?</p>
<p>Hey, I just gave hacking Googles search page a shot and found it is VERY VERY easy to remove the top graphic and change the search page to leave off the &#8220;Search Domain.com&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/custom?q=ipod&#038;hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=ISO-8859-1&#038;client=pub-4235796461002755&#038;cof=FORID:1%3BLH:44%3BLW:270%3BGL:1%3BBGC:FFFFFF%3BT:%23000000%3BLC:%23003399%3BVLC:%23cc0000%3BALC:%23003399%3BGALT:%23888888%3BGFNT:%23003399%3BGIMP:%23003399%3BDIV:%23003399%3BLBGC:003399%3BAH:center%3B&#038;start=0&#038;sa=N" rel="nofollow">schwarztech.us  hacked Google search</a>  Clicking this link will bring you to a page or search results.  I bet even with the banner removed the Ad&#8217;s still generate a penny or 2 for <a href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/08/google-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program#6322" rel="nofollow">Eric</a>.  So the only thing I don&#8217;t know is what they did to redirect people to their Google search results.  </p>
<p>Being so close to Mountain View, I would think a Google employee or 2 might have made it up there.  They should be fired if they either don&#8217;t notice or can&#8217;t figure out what to do about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Steinbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Steinbaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>I had that on my site for 30 minutes and decided that the positioning of the ads is just awful. Not many people click on ads in the search results anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had that on my site for 30 minutes and decided that the positioning of the ads is just awful. Not many people click on ads in the search results anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>From the &quot;what is this page&quot; link in the upper right hand corner of the page you posted -- 

&quot;....or if you got to this page after doing a search on Google&#039;s own site (www.google.com), please let us know. &quot;

It would seem that they ARE certainly in violation of the rules.
I say report their ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the &#8220;what is this page&#8221; link in the upper right hand corner of the page you posted &#8212; </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;.or if you got to this page after doing a search on Google&#8217;s own site (www.google.com), please let us know. &#8220;</p>
<p>It would seem that they ARE certainly in violation of the rules.<br />
I say report their ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7887</guid>
		<description>Interesting, I can&#039;t say that I think that it&#039;s Google&#039;s system unless it&#039;s coming from a personalized version using the API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I can&#8217;t say that I think that it&#8217;s Google&#8217;s system unless it&#8217;s coming from a personalized version using the API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7888</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7888</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/services/adsense_tour/page6.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This screenshoot&lt;/a&gt; in the tour pages looks somewhat like what you are getting. I say it seems pretty much google-oked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/services/adsense_tour/page6.html" rel="nofollow">This screenshoot</a> in the tour pages looks somewhat like what you are getting. I say it seems pretty much google-oked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7889</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7889</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s just some cleverness by the folks running the blog summit to point google.com at their affiliate search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s just some cleverness by the folks running the blog summit to point google.com at their affiliate search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConÃ¡nn</title>
		<link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F08%2Fgoogle-redesign-or-stealthy-affiliate-program&amp;seed_title=Google+Redesign+or+Stealthy+Affiliate+Program%3F/comment-page-1#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>ConÃ¡nn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely AdSense search, I use it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;client=pub-9700131075453334&amp;cof=FORID%3A1%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fconann.com%2Fthemes%2Fc2005%2Fgravatar.jpg%3BLH%3A181%3BLW%3A181%3BLP%3A1%3BGL%3A1%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BT%3A%23000000%3BLC%3A%23ff9c2a%3BVLC%3A%23009966%3BALC%3A%23ff9c2a%3BGALT%3A%23008000%3BGFNT%3A%230000ff%3BGIMP%3A%230000ff%3BDIV%3A%23458640%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BAH%3Acenter%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fconann.com%2Fthemes%2Fc2005%2Fgravatar.jpg%3B&amp;sitesearch=conann.com&amp;q=art&amp;btnG=Search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;

I would be very surprised if Google was aware that they were redirecting, it makes no sense for Google to share the revenue on a search unless its searching your domain. Someones done a little wifi network  hack to pass it through their domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely AdSense search, I use it <a href="http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;oe=UTF-8&#038;client=pub-9700131075453334&#038;cof=FORID%3A1%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fconann.com%2Fthemes%2Fc2005%2Fgravatar.jpg%3BLH%3A181%3BLW%3A181%3BLP%3A1%3BGL%3A1%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BT%3A%23000000%3BLC%3A%23ff9c2a%3BVLC%3A%23009966%3BALC%3A%23ff9c2a%3BGALT%3A%23008000%3BGFNT%3A%230000ff%3BGIMP%3A%230000ff%3BDIV%3A%23458640%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BAH%3Acenter%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fconann.com%2Fthemes%2Fc2005%2Fgravatar.jpg%3B&#038;sitesearch=conann.com&#038;q=art&#038;btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
<p>I would be very surprised if Google was aware that they were redirecting, it makes no sense for Google to share the revenue on a search unless its searching your domain. Someones done a little wifi network  hack to pass it through their domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
