<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Unprotecting iTunes vs. Unprotecting Napster</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/archive/2005/02/unprotecting-music/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster</link> <description>A running commentary of occasionally interesting things.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-34233</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-34233</guid> <description>Who cares people in the music business are much more well-off than all of us anyway, I say in this economy we shouldn&#039;t care about stealing music from them. Its like these people drive $50K cars and complaining about we are stealing from them. F Off!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares people in the music business are much more well-off than all of us anyway, I say in this economy we shouldn&#8217;t care about stealing music from them. Its like these people drive $50K cars and complaining about we are stealing from them. F Off!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-33662</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:54:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-33662</guid> <description>I use i-tunes. I bought an i-pod and started downloading not realizing initially that they were protected. I&#039;ve downloaded tons of albums (paid for of course) and truly wish that there was a way to unprotect them ethically and legally. I read above things that certain people wrote concerning illegally obtaining music without paying. I just want to say that I have a friend who is a professional musician in Nashville, making his living in the music industry. If you are a deadbeat downloading illegal music, shame on you. You are part of the reason why very few record companies are signing new artists and why some professional musicians who have spent a huge amount of time, dedication, and money to perfecting their talents, are having to get a part-time job. In my book, you&#039;re low-life, deadbeat, worm dung.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use i-tunes. I bought an i-pod and started downloading not realizing initially that they were protected. I&#8217;ve downloaded tons of albums (paid for of course) and truly wish that there was a way to unprotect them ethically and legally. I read above things that certain people wrote concerning illegally obtaining music without paying. I just want to say that I have a friend who is a professional musician in Nashville, making his living in the music industry. If you are a deadbeat downloading illegal music, shame on you. You are part of the reason why very few record companies are signing new artists and why some professional musicians who have spent a huge amount of time, dedication, and money to perfecting their talents, are having to get a part-time job. In my book, you&#8217;re low-life, deadbeat, worm dung.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Janet A</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-32778</link> <dc:creator>Janet A</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-32778</guid> <description>I like iTunes, and their catalog has more &quot;obscurities&quot; than Napster.  I also use Ruckus.  The problem for me is that I have a non-Apple (Sansa) MP3 player, which is fine for what I need.  But I can&#039;t use my iTunes, paid-for downloads on it unless I go through the CD burn and then upload to Napster, which does recognize Sansa.  I&#039;ve paid for the music and I have a problem with not being able to legally use it as my circumstances dictate.jmap.s.  Yes, analog is better.  Has anyone used a digital turntable to turn analog into digital?  Does it trim the highs and lows the way commercial digital music seems to?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like iTunes, and their catalog has more &#8220;obscurities&#8221; than Napster.  I also use Ruckus.  The problem for me is that I have a non-Apple (Sansa) MP3 player, which is fine for what I need.  But I can&#8217;t use my iTunes, paid-for downloads on it unless I go through the CD burn and then upload to Napster, which does recognize Sansa.  I&#8217;ve paid for the music and I have a problem with not being able to legally use it as my circumstances dictate.</p><p>jma</p><p>p.s.  Yes, analog is better.  Has anyone used a digital turntable to turn analog into digital?  Does it trim the highs and lows the way commercial digital music seems to?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Seth</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-32108</link> <dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 09:02:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-32108</guid> <description>i thank you for this. i have a samsung mp3 player that itunes does not recognize as a device. meaning i cannot put protected itunes music on it. this will help me be able to listen to that stuff on my mp3 player! :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thank you for this. i have a samsung mp3 player that itunes does not recognize as a device. meaning i cannot put protected itunes music on it. this will help me be able to listen to that stuff on my mp3 player! :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Blanks</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-30629</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Blanks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:11:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-30629</guid> <description>I would agree with a lot of people who make the argument that owning music is no longer necessary or even the most practical way... I&#039;m all for signing up for a subscription service such as Napster or Yahoo! Music Unlimited and paying the $15 or so subscription fee. But i want to be able to play that music on my iPod.As of now, for as much as I know, the only service that is iPod compatible as the iTunes Music Store. I would prefer not to pay 99 cents for every song, and just pay a monthly fee.Am i correct in saying that iTunes is the only iPod compatible service? And if thats true, would it be legal to use Tunebite to free that music so i could put it on my iPod?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with a lot of people who make the argument that owning music is no longer necessary or even the most practical way&#8230; I&#8217;m all for signing up for a subscription service such as Napster or Yahoo! Music Unlimited and paying the $15 or so subscription fee. But i want to be able to play that music on my iPod.</p><p>As of now, for as much as I know, the only service that is iPod compatible as the iTunes Music Store. I would prefer not to pay 99 cents for every song, and just pay a monthly fee.</p><p>Am i correct in saying that iTunes is the only iPod compatible service? And if thats true, would it be legal to use Tunebite to free that music so i could put it on my iPod?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-2#comment-25002</link> <dc:creator>john</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:34:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-25002</guid> <description>I have a Macbook with OS X operating on it and I want to know how to if at all to unprotect movies that I purchased through iTunes and also one movie my brother downloaded via Limewire and is now protected after transferring to my new computer. I want to unprotect these files so that I can stream them to my xbox 360. The streaming of video to the 360 from the mac supports MP4 files; however, it does not support the protected mp4 files which really gets to me. If anyone has any idea how to unprotect these files so that I may view them on my 32&quot; lcd tv and not my 13&quot; screen please email me at   socalstud10@hotmail.com.P.S. I have no probelm buying all my movies and not downloading them but if I can&#039;t enjoy what I buy on my own tv I do not see a problem downloading movies. In fact, I am downloading 15+ movies right now and then I will proceed to convert them to a !@#$%$# unprotected mpeg4 VF format and maybe I will even burn them and give them to my friends out of disgust towards these individuals.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Macbook with OS X operating on it and I want to know how to if at all to unprotect movies that I purchased through iTunes and also one movie my brother downloaded via Limewire and is now protected after transferring to my new computer. I want to unprotect these files so that I can stream them to my xbox 360. The streaming of video to the 360 from the mac supports MP4 files; however, it does not support the protected mp4 files which really gets to me. If anyone has any idea how to unprotect these files so that I may view them on my 32&#8243; lcd tv and not my 13&#8243; screen please email me at <a
href="mailto:socalstud10@hotmail.com">socalstud10@hotmail.com</a>.</p><p>P.S. I have no probelm buying all my movies and not downloading them but if I can&#8217;t enjoy what I buy on my own tv I do not see a problem downloading movies. In fact, I am downloading 15+ movies right now and then I will proceed to convert them to a !@#$%$# unprotected mpeg4 VF format and maybe I will even burn them and give them to my friends out of disgust towards these individuals.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Don</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2860</link> <dc:creator>Don</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2860</guid> <description>Most people pay for what they use.  We don&#039;t go around intentionally breaking laws.  They approach it from the perspective that everyone is ripping them off.  Good points about the Wilco project.  If they embrace what the technology can do for them, then it will be a tool for greater income, instead of focusing on the drain they feel it is causing them because of some percentage of &quot;illegal&quot; useage.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people pay for what they use.  We don&#8217;t go around intentionally breaking laws.  They approach it from the perspective that everyone is ripping them off.  Good points about the Wilco project.  If they embrace what the technology can do for them, then it will be a tool for greater income, instead of focusing on the drain they feel it is causing them because of some percentage of &#8220;illegal&#8221; useage.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: matsimpsk</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2861</link> <dc:creator>matsimpsk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2861</guid> <description>The difference, of course, is that you have paid for the songs that you download from iTunes, whereas you don&#039;t if you use the Napster To Go trial.Still, it seems like an awful lot of loops to jump through just for a couple of free albums.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference, of course, is that you have paid for the songs that you download from iTunes, whereas you don&#8217;t if you use the Napster To Go trial.</p><p>Still, it seems like an awful lot of loops to jump through just for a couple of free albums.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2862</link> <dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2862</guid> <description>One big issue one this whole thing is the fact that you can unprotect all of the &quot;subscribed&quot; musice from Napster.  With iTunes, yes you can unprotect it, but you&#039;ve already paid for that song in particular.  Just my take on it anyhow.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One big issue one this whole thing is the fact that you can unprotect all of the &#8220;subscribed&#8221; musice from Napster.  With iTunes, yes you can unprotect it, but you&#8217;ve already paid for that song in particular.  Just my take on it anyhow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike D.</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2863</link> <dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2863</guid> <description>mastimpsk and Aaron:  Good points regarding the subscribe vs. buy thing.  Doesn&#039;t Napster also offer a download-to-purchase option as well though?I think you are both right in that &quot;cracking&quot; subscribed music as opposed to purchased music is probably a bit worse, but hey, it&#039;s still cracking however you slice it.I also wonder about the validity of the alleged e-mails from Jobs. They have apparently been confirmed by some music executives, but it really seems a bit beneath Steve to do that, don&#039;t you think?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mastimpsk and Aaron:  Good points regarding the subscribe vs. buy thing.  Doesn&#8217;t Napster also offer a download-to-purchase option as well though?</p><p>I think you are both right in that &#8220;cracking&#8221; subscribed music as opposed to purchased music is probably a bit worse, but hey, it&#8217;s still cracking however you slice it.</p><p>I also wonder about the validity of the alleged e-mails from Jobs. They have apparently been confirmed by some music executives, but it really seems a bit beneath Steve to do that, don&#8217;t you think?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Schontzler</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2864</link> <dc:creator>David Schontzler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2864</guid> <description>You forgot to mention Hymn, which allows you to strip the DRM without having to first make a CD. The only reason I&#039;ve ever purchases anything from iTMS is because there is something like Hymn out there. That way, I know that I can un-DRM all my purchased tunes if need be should I want to use something besides iTunes and Win/Mac.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention Hymn, which allows you to strip the DRM without having to first make a CD. The only reason I&#8217;ve ever purchases anything from iTMS is because there is something like Hymn out there. That way, I know that I can un-DRM all my purchased tunes if need be should I want to use something besides iTunes and Win/Mac.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gabriel Mihalache</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2865</link> <dc:creator>Gabriel Mihalache</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2865</guid> <description>Simply because something illegal is easy to do doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s less illegal, only that lawmakers and dependent business owners are going to have a hard time.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simply because something illegal is easy to do doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s less illegal, only that lawmakers and dependent business owners are going to have a hard time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Croft</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2866</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Croft</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2866</guid> <description>Well, someone beat me to the point, but I was going to say this:In order to obtain a song from iTunes, you must pay $0.99 for it. If you then un-DRM it, you at least have paid for it first. So, to un-DRM 1000 songs would cost you $999.On the other hand, Napster is $15 per month (and free for the trial) for &lt;em&gt;unlimited&lt;/em&gt; downloads. You pay your $15 and then you download 1000 songs -- un-DRMing them cost you only $15. Effectively, you&#039;ve &quot;stolen&quot; 885 songs.Granted, both scenarios are illegal, but in the case of iTunes, we&#039;re talking about small potatoes. We&#039;re talking about stripping a very lose, unrestrictive DRM from a song &lt;em&gt;after&lt;/em&gt; you&#039;ve paid for it. In the case of Napster, we&#039;re talking about stripping a very tight, restrictive DRM from a song you didn&#039;t pay for. It is for this reason that I imagine the record companies will have a bigger concern with the Napster problem than with the iTunes, even though they are both technically &quot;illegal.&quot;While I also doubt the validity of the claim the note was from Jobs, this is definitely a win for Apple in the record companies&#039; eyes. If, as you say, DRM is breakable and always will be, then it will be &lt;em&gt;impearative&lt;/em&gt; to the labels that music is paid for &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; it is downloaded in any form.And to answer your question -- yes, you can pay an &lt;em&gt;additional&lt;/em&gt; $0.99 to Napster (on top of your $15/mo fee) to be able to burn your song to CD. But, these is not really relevant. The finles that were being un-DRMed were non-burnable, $15/mo-only files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, someone beat me to the point, but I was going to say this:</p><p>In order to obtain a song from iTunes, you must pay $0.99 for it. If you then un-DRM it, you at least have paid for it first. So, to un-DRM 1000 songs would cost you $999.</p><p>On the other hand, Napster is $15 per month (and free for the trial) for <em>unlimited</em> downloads. You pay your $15 and then you download 1000 songs &#8212; un-DRMing them cost you only $15. Effectively, you&#8217;ve &#8220;stolen&#8221; 885 songs.</p><p>Granted, both scenarios are illegal, but in the case of iTunes, we&#8217;re talking about small potatoes. We&#8217;re talking about stripping a very lose, unrestrictive DRM from a song <em>after</em> you&#8217;ve paid for it. In the case of Napster, we&#8217;re talking about stripping a very tight, restrictive DRM from a song you didn&#8217;t pay for. It is for this reason that I imagine the record companies will have a bigger concern with the Napster problem than with the iTunes, even though they are both technically &#8220;illegal.&#8221;</p><p>While I also doubt the validity of the claim the note was from Jobs, this is definitely a win for Apple in the record companies&#8217; eyes. If, as you say, DRM is breakable and always will be, then it will be <em>impearative</em> to the labels that music is paid for <em>before</em> it is downloaded in any form.</p><p>And to answer your question &#8212; yes, you can pay an <em>additional</em> $0.99 to Napster (on top of your $15/mo fee) to be able to burn your song to CD. But, these is not really relevant. The finles that were being un-DRMed were non-burnable, $15/mo-only files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike D.</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2867</link> <dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2867</guid> <description>Jeff:  Good points.  So if Jobs were to be listened to, there would be no subscription model for music, ever.  You pay to own and that&#039;s that.The problem with this thinking, in my mind, is that there are so many examples of other models out there which people are already using.  There is the Rhapsody/Napster paid subscription model.  There is the XM/Sirius paid subscription model.  There is IP-based internet radio.  Whenever you send bits down the line, those bits can always be captured, saved, and un-DRMed if necessary.  Heck, WireTap for OS X just captures the sound directly through the audio channel on your Mac... no hacking necessary.  I understand that what makes this Napster case so bad is the on-demand nature of the music available, but what happens when you have 2000 channels of satellite radio or IP-based radio to choose from?  Anything played on these channels can be automatically captured, saved, and shared, so the &quot;problem&quot; just becomes bigger as more music becomes available.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff:  Good points.  So if Jobs were to be listened to, there would be no subscription model for music, ever.  You pay to own and that&#8217;s that.</p><p>The problem with this thinking, in my mind, is that there are so many examples of other models out there which people are already using.  There is the Rhapsody/Napster paid subscription model.  There is the XM/Sirius paid subscription model.  There is IP-based internet radio.  Whenever you send bits down the line, those bits can always be captured, saved, and un-DRMed if necessary.  Heck, WireTap for OS X just captures the sound directly through the audio channel on your Mac&#8230; no hacking necessary.  I understand that what makes this Napster case so bad is the on-demand nature of the music available, but what happens when you have 2000 channels of satellite radio or IP-based radio to choose from?  Anything played on these channels can be automatically captured, saved, and shared, so the &#8220;problem&#8221; just becomes bigger as more music becomes available.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike S</title><link>http://www.mikeindustries.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&#038;feed=Articles+%28RSS2%29&#038;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mikeindustries.com%2Fblog%2Farchive%2F2005%2F02%2Funprotecting-music&#038;seed_title=Unprotecting+iTunes+vs.+Unprotecting+Napster/comment-page-1#comment-2868</link> <dc:creator>Mike S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">#comment-2868</guid> <description>The problem with using utilities like WireTap is that you don&#039;t really get the complete song. This is especially obvious when you&#039;re trying to steal from radio.When you finally realize that the song you want to copy is on you have to launch the program and hit record. By then you&#039;ve missed at least the first 10 seconds of the song. Once you&#039;re recording you have to hope to hell that your computer doesn&#039;t give you an alert sound or any other sound for that matter.The major kick in the pants is when you get those really bad DJ&#039;s cutting into the song. From then on when you want to listen to your stolen radio song you&#039;re constantly reminded that you got it from the radio.And from what I&#039;ve heard women aren&#039;t really into guys cruisin&#039; the streets with a pimped stereo, blasting the latest and greatest song that gets interrupted by some lame-ass internet DJ.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with using utilities like WireTap is that you don&#8217;t really get the complete song. This is especially obvious when you&#8217;re trying to steal from radio.</p><p>When you finally realize that the song you want to copy is on you have to launch the program and hit record. By then you&#8217;ve missed at least the first 10 seconds of the song. Once you&#8217;re recording you have to hope to hell that your computer doesn&#8217;t give you an alert sound or any other sound for that matter.</p><p>The major kick in the pants is when you get those really bad DJ&#8217;s cutting into the song. From then on when you want to listen to your stolen radio song you&#8217;re constantly reminded that you got it from the radio.</p><p>And from what I&#8217;ve heard women aren&#8217;t really into guys cruisin&#8217; the streets with a pimped stereo, blasting the latest and greatest song that gets interrupted by some lame-ass internet DJ.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 60/74 queries in 0.166 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 570/625 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.mikeindustries.com @ 2012-02-09 00:40:48 -->
